MENU

Call Recording FEATURED ARTICLE

Feds Can Spy on Americans Warrantless

September 04, 2012

On August 7, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a suit that challenged President George W. Bush’s once-secret Terrorist Surveillance Program. 

The case was filed after it became known that telephone conversations between two American attorneys’ and their clients in Saudi Arabia were illegally wiretapped without warrants and siphoned to the National Security Agency (NSA).

“This case was the only chance to litigate and hold anybody accountable for the warrantless wiretapping program,” said Jon Eisenberg, the California lawyer representing the two. “As illegal as it was, it evaded accountability.”

He based the case on violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which describes procedures for requesting both judicial authorization for electronic surveillance and physical searches of persons engaged in espionage or international terrorism against the United States on behalf of a foreign power. 


Image via Shutterstock

The law was written by Congress in light of the former President Richard M. Nixon’s Watergate scandal. The court found that while the act regulates eavesdropping of the government on Americans, it never relinquished sovereign immunity, so it was never intended for the aggrieved to be able to sue the government – even when constitutional rights were violated by the United States breaking its own wire-tapping laws.

“Although such a structure may seem anomalous and even unfair, the policy judgment is one for Congress, not the courts,” said Judge M. Margaret McKeown. Following the dismissal, Eisenberg then asked the appeals court to reconsider the case via en blanc panel.

Another major case contesting wiretapping programs and domestic spying laws was the (EFF) Electronic Frontier Foundation’s case, which stemmed from a leak about a secret room in an AT&T office in San Francisco that routed internet traffic to the NSA. In this case, the federal government was accused of working with the nation’s largest telecommunications companies to listen in on Americans’ conversations.

The appeals court ruled in favor of the government, citing act of Congress from July 2008, which granted retroactive immunity to telecommunication companies and thereby prevented them from being arraigned for supposedly partaking in the surveillance program.

The case was dismissed and directed back to a district court after it survived the ruling of the appeals court.

Want to learn more about the latest in communications and technology? Then be sure to attend ITEXPO West 2012, taking place Oct. 2-5, in Austin, TX. Stay in touch with everything happening at ITEXPO. Follow us on Twitter.




Edited by Braden Becker

Article comments powered by Disqus
Call Recording Enewsletter Sign Up
Get a Demo
Press Inquiries

Featured Resources

SIP Print Uses Innovative Design Elements and Thought Leadership to Rank the "Call Recording" Comminuty at the Top of Search Engines

This Case Study highlights how SIP Print maintains their Online Community, and outlines how they are able to use the Online Community to position SIP Print as an industry leader and keep ranking at the top of major search engines week after week ...

Call recording for your IP PBX

Whatever the size of your organization - from a small professional corporation to a large enterprise - you chose to deploy a VoIP communications system for the capital and operational cost savings and the productivity advantages for your users ...

What's in the Box?

SIP Print CEO Don Palmer discusses appliance-based enterprise and SMB call recording ...


PARTNER SHOWCASE


  • ABP
  • ATT
  • Adtran
  • AllWorx
  • CenturyLink
  • Cisco
  • Grandstream
  • Ingram
  • Interface Masters
  • Matrix
  • metaswitch
  • nec
  • Sangoma
  • Secura
  • snom
  • Verizon
  • Windstream
  • XO
  • Zultys
GSA